Legal Opinion

D'Orazio Et Ux. v. Pashby

Supreme Court of Vermont

Decided May 7, 1930PublishedCited by 19 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtThompson, J.

This is an action of tort to recover damages for destroying a fence on the plaintiffs’ land on St. Paul Street in the city of Burlington. The real controversy is over the location of the boundary line between the plaintiffs’ lot and the lot owned by defendant Benjamin Pashby, and a certain prescriptive right claimed by said Benjamin Pashby in a driveway.

The plaintiffs’ lot was conveyed to them by David J. Leonard and Henry H. Rierden by their warranty deed dated April 1, 1926, and is described in said deed as “Lot No. 14 as laid down on a plan of land of 0 ’Neil, McSweeney and Andrews, which…

2Cases cited27 opinions

  1. Wellman, Admr. v. WalesSupreme Court of Vermont · 1925
  2. Vermont Marble Co. v. EastmanSupreme Court of Vermont · 1917
  3. Henderson v. GriffinSupreme Court of the United States · 1831
  4. French v. WheldonSupreme Court of Vermont · 1916
  5. Barber v. BaileySupreme Court of Vermont · 1912

22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by19 opinions

  1. Amey v. HallSupreme Court of Vermont · 1962
  2. Neill v. WardSupreme Court of Vermont · 1930
  3. Russell v. PareSupreme Court of Vermont · 1974
  4. Parrow v. ProulxSupreme Court of Vermont · 1940
  5. Okemo Mountain, Inc. v. LysobeySupreme Court of Vermont · 2005

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API