Legal Opinion
Dabney v. Dabney
California Court of Appeal
Decided November 1, 1935No. Civ. 5434PublishedCited by 13 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtPlummer, J.
This action was brought by the plaintiff to recover the amount due upon a certain contract in writing, and also to establish the plaintiff’s right to a contingent claim against the estate of Joseph B. Dabney, deceased, and to have sequestered from the estate of Joseph B. Dabney, deceased, a sum sufficient to insure the payment of the amount of the contingent claim. Claims covering the amount alleged to be due, and also covering the contingent claim were presented to the administrators of the estate of Joseph B. Dabney, deceased, and by them rejected.
The record shows that prior to the…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Etchas v. OrenaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1900
- Newman v. BurwellCalifornia Supreme Court · 1932
- Verdier v. RoachCalifornia Supreme Court · 1892
- Loomis F.G. Assn. v. California F. Exch.California Court of Appeal · 1932
- Sime v. HunterCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1920
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by13 opinions
- Crestview Cemetery Ass'n v. DiedenCalifornia Supreme Court · 1960
- Joost v. CastelCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1939
- Bettis Rubber Co. v. KleaverCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1951
- Dabney v. DabneyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1942
- Newhall v. NewhallCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1964
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.