Legal Opinion
Joost v. Castel
California Court of Appeal
Decided May 31, 1939No. Civ. 11035PublishedCited by 12 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtSturtevant, J.
From a judgment in favor of the plaintiff the defendants have appealed.
The action is based upon two claims filed against said estate, both of which were rejected by said representatives. Both claims are based upon a lease made and entered into between H. Joost and Marie A. Joost, as lessors, and Charles A. Munroe, as lessee. The lease was for a period of ten years commencing July 15, 1930. Charles A. Munroe died March 17, 1935.
The amended complaint contained three counts, all of which sought to have the said claims established and approved as valid claims against said estate. The first count…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Hard v. LeurendusNew York Court of Appeals · 1890
- Newman v. BurwellCalifornia Supreme Court · 1932
- Verdier v. RoachCalifornia Supreme Court · 1892
- Phillips-Hollman, Inc. v. Peerless Stages, Inc.California Supreme Court · 1930
- Haddow v. . LundyNew York Court of Appeals · 1874
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by12 opinions
- Kendall v. Ernest Pestana, Inc.California Supreme Court · 1985
- Burns v. McGrawCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1946
- Richfield Oil Corp. v. Security-First National BankCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1958
- University of Redlands v. FordCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1942
- Miller & Desatnik Management Co. v. BullockAppellate Division of the Superior Court of California · 1990
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.