Legal Opinion
Conforti & Eisele, Inc. v. DIV. BLDG. & CONSTR.
New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division
Decided June 25, 1979PublishedCited by 27 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
170 N.J. Super. 64 (1979)
405 A.2d 487
CONFORTI & EISELE, INC., A NEW YORK CORPORATION AUTHORIZED TO DO BUSINESS IN NEW JERSEY, PLAINTIFF,
v.
THE DIVISION OF BUILDING AND CONSTRUCTION, DEPARTMENT OF THE TREASURY, STATE OF NEW JERSEY, ET AL., DEFENDANTS.
Superior Court of New Jersey, Law Division.
June 25, 1979.
Mr. Edward J. Frisch for plaintiff (Messrs. Lindabury, McCormick & Estabrook, attorneys).
Mr. Lawrence Moncher Deputy Attorney General, for defendant (Mr. John J. Degnan, Attorney General, attorney; Mr. Jeffrey W. Jones, Deputy Attorney General, on the brief).
MARZULLI, J.S.C.
Conforti & Eisele,…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- State v. KociolekSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1957
- Sun Dial Corp. v. RideoutSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1954
- International Industries, Inc. v. Warren Petroleum Corp.District Court, D. Delaware · 1951
- Black v. AmenSupreme Court of the United States · 1958
- State v. LoponioSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1913
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by27 opinions
- Erickson v. Newmar Corp.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1996
- Paul v. Rawlings Sporting Goods Co.District Court, S.D. Ohio · 1988
- Wang Laboratories, Inc. v. Toshiba Corp.District Court, E.D. Virginia · 1991
- Peat, Marwick, Mitchell & Co. v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1988
- Mayer v. DellDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 1991
22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.