Legal Opinion

Black v. Amen

Supreme Court of the United States

Decided March 3, 1958No. 13PublishedCited by 29 opinions

1Per curiam

Petitioners' amended motion, concurred in by the attorneys for respondents, is granted. The case is remanded to the Court of Appeals with directions to remand the cause to the United States District Court for the District of Kansas to enable the parties to file their joint motion for the entry of judgment dismissing the action, as provided in paragraph 3 of the Settlement Agreement dated February 27, 1958, a copy of which is annexed to the amended motion.

Mr. Justice Frankfurter desires to have it added that he assumes that the legal effect of the Court’s order, in which he joins, upon the…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. United States v. Munsingwear, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1950

3Cited by29 opinions

  1. Virginia W. Sperry, Special Administrator of the Estate of Paul A. Munn, Deceased, and Ida Munn v. Edwin R. Barggren and Edwin D. BarggrenCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1975
  2. People Ex Rel. Averna v. City of Palm SpringsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1958
  3. Hatten v. City of HoustonCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1963
  4. Sperry Rand Corporation, a Delaware Corporation v. A-T-O, Inc. (Formerly 'Automatic Sprinkler Corporation of America')Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1971
  5. Conforti & Eisele, Inc. v. DIV. BLDG. & CONSTR.New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1979

24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API