Legal Opinion

Wang Laboratories, Inc. v. Toshiba Corp.

District Court, E.D. Virginia

Decided May 9, 1991No. Civ. A. 90-1477-APublishedCited by 58 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM OPINION

ELLIS, District Judge.

This is an effort to disqualify an expert. It is occasioned by unusual circumstances: Both sides in a patent infringement suit, first plaintiff Wang Laboratories, Inc. (“Wang”) and then the NEC defendants (“NEC”), 1 apparently engaged the same expert for the same purpose, namely to furnish an opinion on the validity of the patents in issue. Wang moves to disqualify the expert and for leave to conduct discovery aimed at ascertaining what use, if any, the expert made of Wang’s putatively confidential information. For the reasons recorded here, the Court…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Paul v. Rawlings Sporting Goods Co.District Court, S.D. Ohio · 1988
  2. Nikkal Industries, Ltd. v. Salton, Inc.District Court, S.D. New York · 1988
  3. Estate of Halas v. CommissionerUnited States Tax Court · 1990
  4. Marvin Lumber & Cedar Co. v. Norton Co.District Court, D. Minnesota · 1986
  5. Conforti & Eisele, Inc. v. DIV. BLDG. & CONSTR.New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1979

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by58 opinions

  1. English Feedlot, Inc. v. Norden Laboratories, Inc.District Court, D. Colorado · 1993
  2. Formosa Plastics Corp., USA v. Kajima International, Inc., Texas Court of Appeals, 13th District2006
  3. Mayer v. DellDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 1991
  4. Nelson v. McCrearyDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1997
  5. United States Ex Rel. Cherry Hill Convalescent Center, Inc. v. Healthcare Rehab Systems, Inc.District Court, D. New Jersey · 1997

53 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API