Legal Opinion

Paul v. Rawlings Sporting Goods Co.

District Court, S.D. Ohio

Decided November 8, 1988No. C2-86-0274PublishedCited by 61 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

*273OPINION AND ORDER

TERENCE P. KEMP, United States Magistrate.

I. INTRODUCTION

This matter is before me to decide the motion of Rawlings Sporting Goods Company (“Rawlings”) to disqualify Werner Goldsmith, Ph.D., as plaintiffs’ expert witness. That motion was filed on August 23, 1988 together with a supporting affidavit. Plaintiffs, Michael Paul, et al. (“Paul”) responded and filed a counteraffidavit on September 20, 1988. Rawlings filed a reply brief on October 11, 1988. With that reply brief, Rawlings submitted tape recordings and transcriptions of telephone conversations between Daniel…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Williams v. Trans World Airlines, Inc.District Court, W.D. Missouri · 1984
  2. Marvin Lumber & Cedar Co. v. Norton Co.District Court, D. Minnesota · 1986
  3. Conforti & Eisele, Inc. v. DIV. BLDG. & CONSTR.New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1979
  4. Miles v. FarrellDistrict Court, N.D. Illinois · 1982

3Cited by61 opinions

  1. Lauren Ross v. American Red CrossCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2014
  2. Erickson v. Newmar Corp.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1996
  3. English Feedlot, Inc. v. Norden Laboratories, Inc.District Court, D. Colorado · 1993
  4. In Re American Home Products Corp.Texas Supreme Court · 1998
  5. Wang Laboratories, Inc. v. Toshiba Corp.District Court, E.D. Virginia · 1991

56 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API