Legal Opinion
Erickson v. Newmar Corp.
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided June 18, 1996No. 94-15726PublishedCited by 67 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
FERGUSON, Circuit Judge:
Pro se plaintiff, Donald Erickson, brought suit against Newmar Corporation, claiming that his motor home, which was manufactured by the defendant, was defective. Erickson alleged violations of the Consumer Product Warranty Act1 and supplemental state law claims including breach of the implied warranty of merchantability, fraud, negligence, and breach of the implied covenant of good faith and fair dealing. After a bench trial, the district court ruled in favor of Newmar on all claims. Erickson appeals pro se and raises numerous issues, including an allegation that…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Chambers v. Nasco, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1991
- Frazier v. HeebeSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
- Fed. Sec. L. Rep. P 93,675 James M. Richardson v. Hamilton International CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1972
- Gas-A-Tron of Arizona and Coinoco v. Union Oil Company of California, Petrol Stops Northwest v. Continental Oil CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1976
- English Feedlot, Inc. v. Norden Laboratories, Inc.District Court, D. Colorado · 1993
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by67 opinions
- Molski v. Evergreen Dynasty Corp.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2007
- Hutchinson v. PfeilCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1997
- Michael Skidmore v. Led ZeppelinCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2020
- Pearson v. First NH Mortgage Corp.Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1999
- In Re Greate Bay Hotel & Casino, Inc.United States Bankruptcy Court, D. New Jersey · 2000
62 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.