Legal Opinion

Horky v. Schroll

Nebraska Supreme Court

Decided March 7, 1947No. 32159PublishedCited by 15 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtChappell, J.

Plaintiff instituted this action to recover damages for assault and battery. A jury awarded a verdict for $2,500, upon which judgment was entered. Defendants’ motion for new trial was overruled, and they appealed to this court, assigning as error that: (1) The trial court erred in denying defendants the right to plead or prove acts of provocation; (2) erred in permitting *97plaintiff to cumulate evidence as to the circumstances of the assault which was allegedly admitted by defendants’ answer; (3) erred in giving instruction No. 9; and (4) that the verdict was excessive. We conclude that the…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Van Auker v. Steckley's Hybrid Seed Corn Co.Nebraska Supreme Court · 1943
  2. Shiman Bros. v. Nebraska National Hotel Co.Nebraska Supreme Court · 1945
  3. Sutton v. Inland Construction Co.Nebraska Supreme Court · 1944
  4. Ogden v. CampNebraska Supreme Court · 1907
  5. Ulrich v. SchwarzWisconsin Supreme Court · 1929

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by15 opinions

  1. Daniels Ex Rel. Jones v. AndersenNebraska Supreme Court · 1975
  2. Plumb v. BurnhamNebraska Supreme Court · 1949
  3. Rueger v. HawksNebraska Supreme Court · 1949
  4. O'DELL v. GoodsellNebraska Supreme Court · 1950
  5. Vacanti v. Master Electronics Corp.Nebraska Supreme Court · 1994

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API