Legal Opinion

Ulrich v. Schwarz

Wisconsin Supreme Court

Decided April 30, 1929PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtOwen, J.

On the evening of August 12, 1927, the defendant struck the plaintiff with his fist in the vicinity of his right ear. This action was brought to recover damages. The assault and battery is not denied. Upon the trial the defendant sought to introduce proof to show that at the time of the assault the plaintiff was one of a party of young men who had entered upon the premises of’ and were then engaged in provoking a quarrel with, defendant’s brother. The reception of this evidence was urged as proper in the mitigation of compensatory damages, upon the authority of Wilson v. Young, 31 Wis. 574.…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Craker v. Chicago & Northwestern Railway Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1875
  2. Fenelon v. ButtsWisconsin Supreme Court · 1881
  3. Grace v. DempseyWisconsin Supreme Court · 1889
  4. Hurst v. Webster Manufacturing Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1906
  5. Wilson v. YoungWisconsin Supreme Court · 1872

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Affett v. Milwaukee & Suburban Transport Corp.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1960
  2. Font Suárez v. PastranaSupreme Court of Puerto Rico · 1952
  3. State v. CotterWisconsin Supreme Court · 1952
  4. Horky v. SchrollNebraska Supreme Court · 1947
  5. Wiedenhaupt v. HoelzelWisconsin Supreme Court · 1948

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API