Legal Opinion

Rueger v. Hawks

Nebraska Supreme Court

Decided March 3, 1949No. 32488PublishedCited by 29 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtMessmore, J.

This is an action at law to recover damages for personal injuries sustained by the plaintiff as the result of an automobile collision. The pleadings are of importance in determining this appeal and a summary thereof is deemed necessary.

Plaintiff’s petition filed January 2, 1947, alleged that she is a resident of Kansas; that the defendant W. A. Hawks is a resident of Bruning, Thayer County, Nebraska, and that the defendant Harry N. Spencer is a resident of Douglas County, Nebraska. The petition further alleged that on November 17, 1946, the plaintiff was riding as a passenger in the front…

2Cases cited27 opinions

  1. Kanopka v. KanopkaSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1931
  2. Bankers Life Insurance v. RobbinsNebraska Supreme Court · 1899
  3. Davis v. StateNebraska Supreme Court · 1891
  4. McFaden v. NordblomMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1940
  5. Crowell v. GallowayNebraska Supreme Court · 1874

22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by29 opinions

  1. Jahnig v. CoismanSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1979
  2. Cross v. CommonwealthSupreme Court of Virginia · 1953
  3. Danner v. WaltersNebraska Supreme Court · 1951
  4. McNish v. General Credit CorporationNebraska Supreme Court · 1957
  5. Matlow v. MatlowArizona Supreme Court · 1961

24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API