Boyden v. United Mercury Mines Co.
Idaho Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtGivens, J.
W. B. Boyden contracted with the United Mercury Mines Company, a corporation, to construct, set up and install on the Hermes mining claim, belonging to respondents, a mercury ore reduction plant of approximately forty tons’ capacity per day of not less than ninety per cent efficiency for the sum of $40,000 payable as follows: $15,000 by issuing 50,000 shares of capital stock of respondent to be delivered sixty days after the reduction plant should be installed. $2'5,000 by fifty per cent of the net proceeds of the sale of the mercury so produced, or by the delivery of quicksilver equal to…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- M. J. Daly & Sons, Inc. v. New Haven Hotel Co.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1917
- City of St. Charles v. StookeyCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1907
- Davidson v. GaskillSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1912
- Ætna Iron & Steel Works v. Kossuth CountySupreme Court of Iowa · 1890
- Scholz v. SchneckIndiana Supreme Court · 1910
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Weed v. Idaho Copper Co.Idaho Supreme Court · 1932
- Smith v. BoydenIdaho Supreme Court · 1930