Legal Opinion

Boyden v. United Mercury Mines Co.

Idaho Supreme Court

Decided May 22, 1928No. 5007PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtGivens, J.

W. B. Boyden contracted with the United Mercury Mines Company, a corporation, to construct, set up and install on the Hermes mining claim, belonging to respondents, a mercury ore reduction plant of approximately forty tons’ capacity per day of not less than ninety per cent efficiency for the sum of $40,000 payable as follows: $15,000 by issuing 50,000 shares of capital stock of respondent to be delivered sixty days after the reduction plant should be installed. $2'5,000 by fifty per cent of the net proceeds of the sale of the mercury so produced, or by the delivery of quicksilver equal to…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. M. J. Daly & Sons, Inc. v. New Haven Hotel Co.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1917
  2. City of St. Charles v. StookeyCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1907
  3. Davidson v. GaskillSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1912
  4. Ætna Iron & Steel Works v. Kossuth CountySupreme Court of Iowa · 1890
  5. Scholz v. SchneckIndiana Supreme Court · 1910

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Weed v. Idaho Copper Co.Idaho Supreme Court · 1932
  2. Smith v. BoydenIdaho Supreme Court · 1930

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API