Legal Opinion

Smith v. Boyden

Idaho Supreme Court

Decided July 25, 1930No. 5390PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

BRINCK, District Judge.-

In 1923 the defendant Boyden made a contract with the defendant United Mercury Mines Company, whereby he agreed to construct and install, upon mining property of the company in Yalley county, a mercury ore reduction plant for the agreed compensation of $40,000, $15,000 to be paid in stock of the company, and $25,000 to be paid out of fifty per cent of the proceeds of mercury produced by the plant. The plant was constructed after a fashion, but failed to operate successfully and never produced any mercury. The company refused to pay for it, and Boyden and his assignees…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Frank v. Butte & Boulder Mining & Lumber Co.Montana Supreme Court · 1913
  2. Carrick v. SturtevantArizona Supreme Court · 1925
  3. Boyden v. United Mercury Mines Co.Idaho Supreme Court · 1928

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. C. E. Hood, Jr. v. Gordy Homes, Incorporated, a Delaware Corporation, Duly Domesticated Under the Laws of the State of South CarolinaCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1959
  2. Peterson v. BellIdaho Supreme Court · 1931

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API