Legal Opinion

Weed v. Idaho Copper Co.

Idaho Supreme Court

Decided April 8, 1932No. 5735PublishedCited by 19 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtGivens, J.

Respondent’s first cause of action is for an unpaid salary balance for personal services, and the second for reimbursement for expenses incurred by him in such employment. The complaint alleged in substance respondent’s employment at a yearly salary of $15,000, or $1,250 per month, and a balance of $7,500 thereof, due and unpaid, and that plaintiff had “duly complied with the terms of the contract.” Appellant denied that respondent had performed the contract; denied he was entitled to reimbursement; and while the answer denied employment as alleged by respondent, the affirmative portion of…

2Cases cited62 opinions

  1. Phillips & Colby Construction Co. v. SeymourSupreme Court of the United States · 1876
  2. Kirk v. CulleyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1927
  3. Hind v. Oriental Products Co., Inc.California Supreme Court · 1925
  4. Miller v. ProutIdaho Supreme Court · 1921
  5. Monroe Water Works Co. v. City of MonroeWisconsin Supreme Court · 1901

57 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by19 opinions

  1. State v. TaylorIdaho Supreme Court · 1939
  2. Durant v. SnyderIdaho Supreme Court · 1944
  3. JR Simplot Company v. ChambersIdaho Supreme Court · 1960
  4. Eastern Idaho Loan & Trust Co. v. BlombergIdaho Supreme Court · 1941
  5. Ohms v. Church of the NazareneIdaho Supreme Court · 1942

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API