City of St. Charles v. Stookey
Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit
In Error to the Circuit Court of the United States for the Eastern District of Missouri.
1Opinion of the Court
SANBORN, Circuit Judge.
In this case the plaintiff below, Charles A. Stookey, recovered a judgment of $10,695.82, the unpaid balance of the agreed price of the construction of a system of waterworks, which consisted of three settling basins, boilers, pumps, power house, pipes, distribution mains and hydrants, for the city of St. Charles The contract price of the works was.about $84,000, and the city had paid the contractor about $75,000, and had taken possession of and was using the works. They had been built under written contracts and specifications, which provided that the contractor should…
2Cases cited51 opinions
- United States Mutual Accident Ass'n v. BarrySupreme Court of the United States · 1889
- Indianapolis & St. Louis Railroad v. HorstSupreme Court of the United States · 1876
- Illinois Trust & Savings Bank v. City of Arkansas CityCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1896
- Swain v. SeamansSupreme Court of the United States · 1870
- Kauffman v. RaederCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1901
46 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by27 opinions
- Mercury Oil Refining Co. v. Oil Workers International Union, CIO Oil Workers International Union, CIO v. Mercury Oil Refining CoCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1951
- Citizens Bldg. of West Palm Beach, Inc. v. Western Union Tel. Co.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1941
- United States ex rel. Wadeford Electric Co. v. E. J. Biggs Const. Co.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1940
- Schimmelpfennig v. GaedkeSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1947
- A. & R. Realty Co. v. Northwestern Mut. Life Ins.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1938
22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.