Legal Opinion

Campbell v. Hanford

California Court of Appeal

Decided May 7, 1924No. Civ. No. 4601PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtLangdon, P. J.

This is an appeal by the defendants from a judgment for $25,000 against them in an action brought by the plaintiff, as assignee of the law firm of Met-son, Drew & Mackenzie, to recover from the defendants the reasonable value of legal services alleged to have been rendered by said firm to the defendants at their request.

According to the testimony which appears in the record in support of the verdict, the defendant Hanford called at the office of the law firm of Metson, Drew & Mackenzie in San Francisco and stated to Mr. Metson that he was representing himself and each and all of the…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Minifie v. RowleyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1921
  2. Knight v. RussCalifornia Supreme Court · 1888
  3. Smith v. Liverpool & London & Globe Ins. Co.California Supreme Court · 1895
  4. Clement v. DuncanCalifornia Supreme Court · 1923
  5. Ferris v. BakerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1900

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Coats v. General Motors Corp.California Court of Appeal · 1934
  2. Corporation of America v. HarrisCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1935
  3. Elblum Holding Corp. v. MintzSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1938
  4. Sebastian International, Inc. v. PeckCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1987
  5. Tandy v. GarveySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1925

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API