Legal Opinion

Elblum Holding Corp. v. Mintz

Supreme Court of New Jersey

Decided August 18, 1938PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the court was delivered by

Perskie, J.

Does a president of a corporation, as such, have authority to employ and authorize an attorney to institute suit at law in behalf of his corporation ?

Plaintiff is a corporation engaged in the real estate business. Its stock is owned equally by two families who are at cross-purposes with each other. An executive committee, consisting of the president, Abraham Elgart, a member of one faction, and the treasurer, Iiarry Mintz, a member of the other faction, manages the business during the intervals between meetings of the board of directors. The…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Ney v. Eastern Iowa Telephone Co.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1913
  2. Murphy v. W. H. & F. W. Cane, Inc.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 1912
  3. Iback v. Elevator Supplies Co., Inc.New Jersey Court of Chancery · 1935
  4. Knopf v. Alma Park, Inc.New Jersey Court of Chancery · 1929
  5. Lastowski v. LawnickiSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1935

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Bernard J. Lee, Platiff-Appellant v. Jenkins Brothers, Bernard J. Lee v. Farnham YardleyCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1959
  2. Tucson Federal Savings & Loan Ass'n v. Aetna Investment Corp.Arizona Supreme Court · 1952
  3. Abeles v. Adams Engineering Co., Inc.New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1960
  4. Alano Club 12, Inc. v. HibbsCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1986
  5. In Re Arkco Properties, Inc.United States Bankruptcy Court, E.D. Arkansas · 1997

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API