Legal Opinion

Corporation of America v. Harris

California Court of Appeal

Decided March 22, 1935No. Civ. 5013PublishedCited by 15 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

WOODWARD, J., pro tem.

The sole question presented by this appeal is whether the appellant Berry Investment Company, a corporation, is liable for unpaid rentals under the terms of a written lease wherein respondent is named as lessor and A. Harris as lessee. Appellant’s name does not appear in the instrument nor is Harris designated therein as an agent or trustee. The trial court found, however, that Harris had acted for himself and also as an agent of appellant corporation. Judgment was accordingly entered against both defendants for accrued rentals and possession of the premises. Harris did…

2Cases cited23 opinions

  1. Seymour v. OelrichsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1909
  2. People v. StokesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1894
  3. Blood v. La Serena Land & Water Co.California Supreme Court · 1896
  4. Llewellyn Iron Works v. Abbott Kidney Co.California Supreme Court · 1916
  5. Gribble v. Columbus Brewing Co.California Supreme Court · 1893

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by15 opinions

  1. Clevenger v. ClevengerCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1961
  2. Marr v. Postal Union Life Insurance Co.California Court of Appeal · 1940
  3. Jeppi v. Brockman Holding Co.California Supreme Court · 1949
  4. Hunt Foods, Inc., a Corporation v. Wellington Phillips and H. W. LiholmCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1957
  5. Crittenden v. McCloudCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1951

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API