Legal Opinion

Meehan v. Meehan

Connecticut Appellate Court

Decided January 16, 1996No. 13300PublishedCited by 14 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtO’Connell, J.

The defendant appeals from the judgment of the trial court denying his motion that the plaintiff be held in contempt of court. The defendant also appeals from the modification of a prior custody and visitation order. The defendant claims that the trial court improperly (1) relied on the plaintiffs fears as a basis for denying the defendant’s motion for contempt, (2) modified a prior pendente lite order of custody and visitation as part of its decision on the defendant’s *109motion for contempt, (3) made factual findings and conclusions of law that were not supported by the facts and law, and (4)…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Pandolphe's Auto Parts, Inc. v. Town of ManchesterSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1980
  2. Pasquariello v. PasquarielloSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1975
  3. Dukes v. DuranteSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1984
  4. Madigan v. MadiganSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1993
  5. Weidenbacher v. DuclosSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1995

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. Weinstein v. WeinsteinSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2005
  2. In re Daniel C.Connecticut Appellate Court · 2001
  3. Crowley v. CrowleyConnecticut Appellate Court · 1997
  4. Tevolini v. TevoliniConnecticut Appellate Court · 2001
  5. Shearn v. ShearnConnecticut Appellate Court · 1998

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API