Legal Opinion
Madigan v. Madigan
Supreme Court of Connecticut
Decided March 2, 1993No. 14574PublishedCited by 40 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtPeters, C. J.
The only issue in this appeal is whether a temporary custody order entered in the course of dissolution proceedings is a final judgment for the purpose of appellate review. The plaintiff, Michael J. Madigan, brought a dissolution action pursuant to General Statutes § 46b-451 to terminate his marriage to the defendant, Michelle A. Madigan. Pending a trial on the merits, the trial court entered an order pursuant to General Statutes § 46b-562 for temporary custody and *751visitation of two of the parties’ three minor children.3 The plaintiff appealed the order to the Appellate Court, which, sua…
2Cases cited22 opinions
- State v. CurcioSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1983
- In re MurrayOhio Supreme Court · 1990
- Yontef v. YontefSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1981
- E. J. Hansen Elevator, Inc. v. StollSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1975
- State v. ParkerSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1984
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by40 opinions
- Pamela B. v. MentSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1998
- Waterbury Teachers Ass'n v. Freedom of Information CommissionSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1994
- Putman v. KennedySupreme Court of Connecticut · 2006
- Crews v. CrewsSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2010
- Sweeney v. SweeneySupreme Court of Connecticut · 2004
35 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.