Legal Opinion
Dukes v. Durante
Supreme Court of Connecticut
Decided February 7, 1984No. 11425; 11479PublishedCited by 74 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtParskey, J.
These appeals arise from a permanent mandatory injunction compelling the defendants to provide adequate replacement housing for persons displaced under the Uniform Relocation Assistance Act, General Statutes §§ 8-266 through 8-282 (hereinafter the act or URAA). At issue is the proper construction of that act.
I
The underlying facts of appeal No. 11425, having been stipulated to, are not in dispute. The plaintiffs are *209former residents of New Haven who brought a class action on behalf of all tenants in the city of New Haven who have been ordered or may be ordered in the future to move from their…
2Cases cited35 opinions
- International Brotherhood of Teamsters v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
- National Labor Relations Board v. Bell Aerospace Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1974
- Seatrain Shipbuilding Corp. v. Shell Oil Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1980
- Bianco v. Town of DarienSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1969
- Birgel v. HeintzSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1972
30 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by74 opinions
- White v. BurnsSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1990
- Peck v. JacqueminSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1985
- Loisel v. RoweSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1995
- Pet v. Department of Health ServicesSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1988
- Concerned Citizens of Sterling v. Town of SterlingSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1987
69 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.