Legal Opinion

Crowley v. Crowley

Connecticut Appellate Court

Decided August 5, 1997No. AC 15975PublishedCited by 24 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

*88 Opinion

DALY, J.

This is an appeal from the modification of a dissolution judgment. The defendant claims that the trial court improperly (1) found a substantial change in circumstances and applied an incorrect legal standard in reaching that conclusion, (2) concluded that the plaintiff would remain in continuing need of support, (3) assessed interest on a modified retroactive alimony award, (4) extended the duration of the fife insurance coverage required by the original dissolution judgment, and (5) awarded counsel fees. We reverse the judgment in part and affirm it in part.

The parties’…

2Cases cited26 opinions

  1. Borkowski v. BorkowskiSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1994
  2. Hardisty v. HardistySupreme Court of Connecticut · 1981
  3. McGuinness v. McGuinnessSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1981
  4. Rubin v. RubinSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1987
  5. Turgeon v. TurgeonSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1983

21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by24 opinions

  1. Ahneman v. AhnemanSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1998
  2. Shearn v. ShearnConnecticut Appellate Court · 1998
  3. Szczerkowski v. KarmelowiczConnecticut Appellate Court · 2000
  4. Azia v. DilasciaConnecticut Appellate Court · 2001
  5. Sabrowski v. SabrowskiConnecticut Appellate Court · 2007

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API