Omscolite Corp. v. Federal Insurance
Michigan Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtAdams, J.
Plaintiffs suffered destruction of the contents of a warehouse, resulting in a claimed loss of $670,801.85. Poyle, the mutual agent of Federal Insurance Company and Connecticut Fire Insurance Company, had placed for plaintiffs a $365,000 policy with Federal and a $200,000 policy with Connecticut. Both insurance companies paid the full amount of the policy coverage pursuant to written proofs of loss submitted by plaintiffs after approximately a month of negotiations.
Plaintiffs now sue to recover the difference between the coverage under the policies and their claimed loss. They allege that on…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- City of Wakefield v. Globe Indemnity Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1929
- Tanner v. MerrillMichigan Supreme Court · 1895
- Miholevich v. Mid-West Mutual Auto InsuranceMichigan Supreme Court · 1933
- Shaw v. United Motors Products Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1927
- Puffer v. State Mutual Rodded Fire InsuranceMichigan Supreme Court · 1932
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Fuller v. Integrated Metal Technology, IncMichigan Court of Appeals · 1986
- George W. Riley and Goldie I. Riley v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1970
- Melick v. Nauman Vandervoort, Inc.Michigan Court of Appeals · 1974
- BALAMOTIS v. HylandSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 2010
- George W. Riley and Goldie I. Riley v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1970