Legal Opinion

Omscolite Corp. v. Federal Insurance

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided January 5, 1965No. Calendar 37, Docket 50,685PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtAdams, J.

Plaintiffs suffered destruction of the contents of a warehouse, resulting in a claimed loss of $670,801.85. Poyle, the mutual agent of Federal Insurance Company and Connecticut Fire Insurance Company, had placed for plaintiffs a $365,000 policy with Federal and a $200,000 policy with Connecticut. Both insurance companies paid the full amount of the policy coverage pursuant to written proofs of loss submitted by plaintiffs after approximately a month of negotiations.

Plaintiffs now sue to recover the difference between the coverage under the policies and their claimed loss. They allege that on…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. City of Wakefield v. Globe Indemnity Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1929
  2. Tanner v. MerrillMichigan Supreme Court · 1895
  3. Miholevich v. Mid-West Mutual Auto InsuranceMichigan Supreme Court · 1933
  4. Shaw v. United Motors Products Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1927
  5. Puffer v. State Mutual Rodded Fire InsuranceMichigan Supreme Court · 1932

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Fuller v. Integrated Metal Technology, IncMichigan Court of Appeals · 1986
  2. George W. Riley and Goldie I. Riley v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1970
  3. Melick v. Nauman Vandervoort, Inc.Michigan Court of Appeals · 1974
  4. BALAMOTIS v. HylandSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 2010
  5. George W. Riley and Goldie I. Riley v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1970

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API