Legal Opinion

Puffer v. State Mutual Rodded Fire Insurance

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided September 16, 1932No. Docket No. 55, Calendar No. 36,558PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtFead, J.

November 29, 1929, defendant issued to plaintiff a policy insuring his residence against fire for $1,600 and the contents for $1,000. The building had an old shingle roof, and, because of it, defendant, on November 14, 1930, assumed to reduce the amount of insurance, under a clause in the policy giving the secretary power to “cancel” or “suspend” the policy or any part of it, and wrote plaintiff:

“Therefore, until this house is reroofed, it will be necessary for us to decrease the insurance pn your dwelling house and contents to one-half the amount which you are now carrying. ’ ’

The letter,…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Jewett v. PetitMichigan Supreme Court · 1857
  2. Pangborn v. Continental InsuranceMichigan Supreme Court · 1888
  3. Shaw v. United Motors Products Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1927
  4. Eisenberg v. C. F. Battenfeld Oil Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1930
  5. Leeson v. AndersonMichigan Supreme Court · 1894

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Durkin v. Everhot Heater Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1934
  2. Fuller v. Integrated Metal Technology, IncMichigan Court of Appeals · 1986
  3. Lehaney v. New York Life Ins. Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1943
  4. Melick v. Nauman Vandervoort, Inc.Michigan Court of Appeals · 1974
  5. Omscolite Corp. v. Federal InsuranceMichigan Supreme Court · 1965

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API