Puffer v. State Mutual Rodded Fire Insurance
Michigan Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtFead, J.
November 29, 1929, defendant issued to plaintiff a policy insuring his residence against fire for $1,600 and the contents for $1,000. The building had an old shingle roof, and, because of it, defendant, on November 14, 1930, assumed to reduce the amount of insurance, under a clause in the policy giving the secretary power to “cancel” or “suspend” the policy or any part of it, and wrote plaintiff:
“Therefore, until this house is reroofed, it will be necessary for us to decrease the insurance pn your dwelling house and contents to one-half the amount which you are now carrying. ’ ’
The letter,…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Jewett v. PetitMichigan Supreme Court · 1857
- Pangborn v. Continental InsuranceMichigan Supreme Court · 1888
- Shaw v. United Motors Products Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1927
- Eisenberg v. C. F. Battenfeld Oil Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1930
- Leeson v. AndersonMichigan Supreme Court · 1894
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- Durkin v. Everhot Heater Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1934
- Fuller v. Integrated Metal Technology, IncMichigan Court of Appeals · 1986
- Lehaney v. New York Life Ins. Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1943
- Melick v. Nauman Vandervoort, Inc.Michigan Court of Appeals · 1974
- Omscolite Corp. v. Federal InsuranceMichigan Supreme Court · 1965
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.