Legal Opinion
Miholevich v. Mid-West Mutual Auto Insurance
Michigan Supreme Court
Decided January 3, 1933No. Docket No. 163, Calendar No. 36,840PublishedCited by 30 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtSharpe, J.
The following- “statement of facts” appears in the brief of the appellant:
“The above canse has reached this court on case-made. Briefly stated, the essential facts are:
“Plaintiff procured of the defendant a policy of insurance which defendant admits is a liability coverage rather than indemnity. A judgment was rendered against the plaintiff, within the limits of the policy of insurance, while he was represented in court by the defendant, such action arising out of an automobile collision during the life of the said policy of insurance. The defendant later caused payment of the judgment to be…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Anoka Lumber Co. v. Fidelity & Casualty Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1895
- Alderton v. WilliamsMichigan Supreme Court · 1905
- Frederick v. HillebrandMichigan Supreme Court · 1917
- Kipkey v. Casualty Ass'n of AmericaMichigan Supreme Court · 1931
- Voss v. StranahanMichigan Supreme Court · 1929
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by30 opinions
- Stanback v. StanbackSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1979
- Kewin v. Massachusetts Mutual Life Insurance CompanyMichigan Supreme Court · 1980
- Stewart v. RudnerMichigan Supreme Court · 1957
- Valentine v. General American Credit, IncMichigan Supreme Court · 1985
- EMPLOYEES'BENEFIT ASS'N v. GrissettSupreme Court of Alabama · 1998
25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.