Legal Opinion

Shaw v. United Motors Products Co.

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided June 6, 1927No. Docket No. 67PublishedCited by 17 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtWiest, J.

The question here presented, by case- made, is determined by the law of accord and satisfaction. Plaintiffs claimed defendant owed them $1,762.50, and, by letter and statement of account, asked payment. Defendant replied by letter with check for $412.50, stating in the letter: “The amount herein, $412.50, is in full, in final payment of our account with you.” Plaintiffs, through attorneys, replied that plaintiffs had received in cash the sum of $412.50 and credited it to defendant’s account, but it was not accepted in full satisfaction of plaintiff’s claim, and demanded satisfactory…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Canton Union Coal Co. v. Parlin & Orendorff Co.Illinois Supreme Court · 1905
  2. Frazier v. RayNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1923
  3. Hoey v. RossMichigan Supreme Court · 1915

3Cited by17 opinions

  1. Hoerstman General Contracting, Inc v. HahnMichigan Supreme Court · 2006
  2. National Mutual Insurance v. Quality Builders, Inc.Michigan Court of Appeals · 1992
  3. Durkin v. Everhot Heater Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1934
  4. Fuller v. Integrated Metal Technology, IncMichigan Court of Appeals · 1986
  5. Deuches v. Grand Rapids Brass Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1927

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API