Shaw v. United Motors Products Co.
Michigan Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtWiest, J.
The question here presented, by case- made, is determined by the law of accord and satisfaction. Plaintiffs claimed defendant owed them $1,762.50, and, by letter and statement of account, asked payment. Defendant replied by letter with check for $412.50, stating in the letter: “The amount herein, $412.50, is in full, in final payment of our account with you.” Plaintiffs, through attorneys, replied that plaintiffs had received in cash the sum of $412.50 and credited it to defendant’s account, but it was not accepted in full satisfaction of plaintiff’s claim, and demanded satisfactory…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Canton Union Coal Co. v. Parlin & Orendorff Co.Illinois Supreme Court · 1905
- Frazier v. RayNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1923
- Hoey v. RossMichigan Supreme Court · 1915
3Cited by17 opinions
- Hoerstman General Contracting, Inc v. HahnMichigan Supreme Court · 2006
- National Mutual Insurance v. Quality Builders, Inc.Michigan Court of Appeals · 1992
- Durkin v. Everhot Heater Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1934
- Fuller v. Integrated Metal Technology, IncMichigan Court of Appeals · 1986
- Deuches v. Grand Rapids Brass Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1927
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.