Legal Opinion
George W. Riley and Goldie I. Riley v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Company
Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit
Decided January 28, 1970No. 19332PublishedCited by 11 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
WEICK, Circuit Judge.
This action was brought in the District Court to recover an amount claimed to be due Rileys under an uninsured automobile clause contained in a liability insurance policy issued by State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Company (State Farm) to its insured, George W. Riley. Jurisdiction was based on diversity of citizenship.
The case was tried to a jury, resulting in a verdict and judgment in favor of the Rileys in the amount of $20,000, which was the full amount of coverage provided in the insurance policy for injuries to the insured caused by an uninsured automobile.…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- City of Wakefield v. Globe Indemnity Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1929
- Bielski v. Wolverine InsuranceMichigan Supreme Court · 1967
- Blake v. Farmers' Mutual Lightning Protected Fire InsuranceMichigan Supreme Court · 1917
- Rorick v. State Mutual Rodded Fire InsuranceMichigan Supreme Court · 1933
- Chicago & Michigan Lake Shore R. R. v. HughesMichigan Supreme Court · 1873
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- Nationwide Mutual Insurance v. WebbCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1981
- State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Co. v. BrekkeSupreme Court of Colorado · 2005
- Olga Despotis Trust v. Cincinnati Insurance CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2017
- Duerlein v. New Jersey Automobile Full Insurance Underwriting Ass'nNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1993
- Peterman v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Co.Colorado Court of Appeals · 1997
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.