Legal Opinion

City of Wakefield v. Globe Indemnity Co.

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided June 3, 1929No. Docket No. 50, Calendar No. 34,002PublishedCited by 89 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Plaintiff city of Wakefield operates an automobile bus line. Defendants carried its liability insurance, under joint policy, in the sum of $10,000 for damages to any one person. Frank Borski was injured by one of the city vehicles, brought suit for damages, defendants assumed the defense, with the city attorney co-operating and attorney of record, and, on trial, Borski recovered judgment for over $15,000, which was affirmed by this court. Borski v. City of Wakefield, 239 Mich. 656. The city having paid the judgment, defendants reimbursed it in the sum of $10,000 and costs. This suit was…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Brassil v. . Maryland Casualty Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1914
  2. Attleboro Mfg. Co. v. Frankfort Marine, Accident & Plate Glass Ins.Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1917
  3. Best Building Co. v. Employers' Liability Assurance Corp.New York Court of Appeals · 1928
  4. Douglas v. United States Fidelity & Guaranty Co.Supreme Court of New Hampshire · 1924
  5. Wisconsin Zinc Co. v. Fidelity & Deposit Co. of MarylandWisconsin Supreme Court · 1916

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by89 opinions

  1. Auto Mutual Indemnity Co. v. ShawSupreme Court of Florida · 1938
  2. Commercial Union Insurance v. Medical Protective Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1986
  3. Abrams v. Factory Mutual Liability InsuranceMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1937
  4. Kunkel v. United Security Ins. Co. of New JerseySouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1969
  5. Traders & General Ins. Co. v. Rudco Oil & Gas Co.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1942

84 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API