Legal Opinion

Palmer v. Regents of University of California

California Court of Appeal

Decided April 8, 2003No. B154868PublishedCited by 19 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

PERLUSS, P. J.

Plaintiff Patricia M. Palmer sued the Regents of the University of California (the Regents) in a common law action for wrongful termination in violation of public policy without first pursuing University of California grievance procedures expressly created to protect employees like Palmer who claim to be victims of retaliation for reporting improper activities. The trial court granted the Regents’ motion for summary judgment based on Palmer’s failure to exhaust the internal remedies available to her. We affirm.

Factual and Procedural Background

1. Palmer’s Termination and…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Far East Conference v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1952
  2. Abelleira v. District Court of AppealCalifornia Supreme Court · 1941
  3. Tameny v. Atlantic Richfield Co.California Supreme Court · 1980
  4. Rojo v. KligerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1990
  5. Reno v. BairdCalifornia Supreme Court · 1998

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by19 opinions

  1. Miklosy v. Regents of the University of CaliforniaCalifornia Supreme Court · 2008
  2. Williams v. Housing Authority of Los AngelesCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2004
  3. McAllister v. Los Angeles Unified School DistrictCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2013
  4. Motevalli v. Los Angeles Unified School DistrictCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2004
  5. Scott v. SOLANO COUNTY HEALTH AND SOCIAL SERVICES DEPARTMENTDistrict Court, E.D. California · 2006

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API