Legal Opinion
Williams v. Housing Authority of Los Angeles
California Court of Appeal
Decided August 12, 2004No. B164111PublishedCited by 26 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
CROSKEY, Acting P. J.
In Schifando v. City of Los Angeles (2003) 31 Cal.4th 1074 [6 Cal.Rptr.3d 457, 79 P.3d 569] (Schifando), the California Supreme Court determined that a city employee who claimed to have suffered employment-related discrimination was not required to exhaust both the internal administrative remedy in the city charter and the administrative remedy provided by the California Fair Employment and Housing Act (FEHA; Gov. Code, § 12900 et seq.), 1 before filing a FEHA disability discrimination claim in superior court. In this case, we must resolve a question identified in…
2Cases cited32 opinions
- Blank v. KirwanCalifornia Supreme Court · 1985
- Abelleira v. District Court of AppealCalifornia Supreme Court · 1941
- Skelly v. State Personnel BoardCalifornia Supreme Court · 1975
- Careau & Co. v. Security Pacific Business Credit, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 1990
- Schifando v. City of Los AngelesCalifornia Supreme Court · 2003
27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by26 opinions
- McKell v. Washington Mutual, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 2006
- Berg & Berg Enterprises, LLC v. BoyleCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2009
- McKell v. Washington Mut., Inc.California Court of Appeal · 2006
- Parthemore v. ColCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2013
- Hervey v. Mercury Casualty Co.California Court of Appeal · 2010
21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.