Legal Opinion

McAllister v. Los Angeles Unified School District

California Court of Appeal

Decided June 3, 2013No. B244759PublishedCited by 24 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

CHAVEZ, J.

Patricia McAllister (appellant) appeals from a final judgment entered after the trial court sustained a demurrer to each of appellant’s causes of action against respondents Los Angeles Unified School District (LAUSD) and John E. Deasy (Deasy), superintendent of LAUSD (collectively respondents). We affirm the judgment.

CONTENTIONS

Appellant contends that the trial court erred in sustaining the demurrer to her third cause of action claiming a deprivation of rights under section 1983 of title 42 of the United States Code (hereafter section 1983). Although appellant concedes that…

2Cases cited24 opinions

  1. Will v. Michigan Department of State PoliceSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
  2. Hafer v. MeloSupreme Court of the United States · 1991
  3. Tameny v. Atlantic Richfield Co.California Supreme Court · 1980
  4. Aubry v. Tri-City Hospital DistrictCalifornia Supreme Court · 1992
  5. Schifando v. City of Los AngelesCalifornia Supreme Court · 2003

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by24 opinions

  1. Julian v. Mission Community HospitalCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2017
  2. Mackey v. Bd. of Trs. of the Cal. State Univ., California Court of Appeal, 5th District2019
  3. Pierce v. San Mateo County Sheriff's DepartmentCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2014
  4. Nevarrez v. San Marino Skilled Nursing & Wellness Centre, LLCCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2013
  5. (PC) Kohut v. AllisonDistrict Court, E.D. California · 2025

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API