O'HARRA v. Pundt
Oregon Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtBrand, J.
The plaintiff O’Harra brought this action in trover against the defendant Pundt on account of the alleged conversion by the defendant of three Malemute dogs. The jury returned a verdict in favor of the plaintiff in the sum of $1,000 compensatory damages and $5,000 punitive damages. The defendant appeals. The sufficiency of the complaint is not challenged. In brief, it alleges that the defendant had temporary custody of the dogs; the plaintiff demanded possession of them, but defendant refused to deliver the dogs to plaintiff, and converted them and disposed of them to his own use. It is…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Martin v. CambasOregon Supreme Court · 1930
- Smith v. Pacific Truck ExpressOregon Supreme Court · 1940
- Linkhart v. SavelyOregon Supreme Court · 1951
- Kingsley v. United Rys. Co.Oregon Supreme Court · 1913
- Clevenger v. SchallhornOregon Supreme Court · 1955
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by31 opinions
- Noe v. Kaiser Foundation HospitalsOregon Supreme Court · 1967
- Kang v. HarringtonHawaii Supreme Court · 1978
- State v. HubbardOregon Supreme Court · 1984
- Krause v. Eugene Dodge, Inc.Oregon Supreme Court · 1973
- Hall v. WorkOregon Supreme Court · 1960
26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.