Legal Opinion

Smith v. Pacific Truck Express

Oregon Supreme Court

Decided February 1, 1940PublishedCited by 32 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtLusk, J.

The plaintiff, Mabel Smith, was injured while riding on a truck operated by the defendant, Pacific Truck Express. She sued to recover her damages, and the jury returned a verdict for the defendant. The circuit court, on motion of- the plaintiff, set aside the verdict and granted a new trial on the ground of error prejudicial to the plaintiff in the exclusion of testimony, and the defendant has appealed. Other questions are raised by the motion for the determination of which a brief statement of the facts is necessary.

Mrs. Smith was the representative of the American Railway Express Agency at…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Albrecht v. Safeway Stores, Inc.Oregon Supreme Court · 1938
  2. Hodge v. Weinstock, Lubin & Co.California Court of Appeal · 1930
  3. Jones v. SinsheimerOregon Supreme Court · 1923
  4. State v. HarrisOregon Supreme Court · 1923
  5. Rosenberg v. MagedaMichigan Supreme Court · 1930

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by32 opinions

  1. Hillman v. Northern Wasco County PUDOregon Supreme Court · 1958
  2. State v. HubbardOregon Supreme Court · 1984
  3. Powers v. TempleSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1967
  4. O'HARRA v. PundtOregon Supreme Court · 1957
  5. Slayter v. PasleyOregon Supreme Court · 1953

27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API