Legal Opinion

State v. Hubbard

Oregon Supreme Court

Decided September 18, 1984No. TC C81-07-33514, CA A23649, SC 29358PublishedCited by 67 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

*791CARSON, J.

The question presented in this case is whether cross-examination related to the arresting officer’s knowledge of internal police department procedures and the potential sanctions against officers who use unnecessary force is relevant to show bias or interest and, if so, whether it was reversible error for the trial judge to exclude the evidence.

FACTS

Defendant was convicted by a jury of and sentenced by the trial court for Escape in the Second Degree, Reckless Driving and Attempting to Elude a Police Officer. The charges stemmed from an encounter between defendant and a police…

2Cases cited20 opinions

  1. Alford v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1931
  2. State v. . RobersonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1939
  3. Rich v. CooperOregon Supreme Court · 1963
  4. Smith v. Pacific Truck ExpressOregon Supreme Court · 1940
  5. O'HARRA v. PundtOregon Supreme Court · 1957

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by67 opinions

  1. State v. RogersOregon Supreme Court · 2000
  2. State v. TitusOregon Supreme Court · 1999
  3. State v. PrattOregon Supreme Court · 1993
  4. State v. RammelUtah Supreme Court · 1986
  5. State v. PhillipsOregon Supreme Court · 1992

62 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API