Legal Opinion

Martin v. Cambas

Oregon Supreme Court

Decided March 27, 1930PublishedCited by 44 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBean, J.

Defendants Cambas, Cart, Brier and Jacques answered separately, claiming that no arrest was made by them. Defendants, upon this appeal, in an appropriate manner, raise the questions to which we will refer. The first is that the verdict apportioning the damages among joint tort-feasors is illegal.

It will be noted that the verdict assessing general damages in favor of plaintiff and against defendant William J. Blake in the sum of $5,000 is complete without that part of the verdict assessing punitive damages and attempting to apportion the same. The verdict is, in effect, in favor of all the…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Gill v. SellingOregon Supreme Court · 1928
  2. Hall ex rel. Hall v. McClureSupreme Court of Kansas · 1923
  3. Inman v. BallSupreme Court of Iowa · 1885
  4. Chrudinsky v. EvansOregon Supreme Court · 1917
  5. Benson v. MurtonOregon Supreme Court · 1913

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by44 opinions

  1. Lundgren v. FreemanCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1962
  2. Davis v. O'BRIENOregon Supreme Court · 1995
  3. Wheeler v. GreenOregon Supreme Court · 1979
  4. Van Lom v. SchneidermanOregon Supreme Court · 1949
  5. State Ex Rel. Young v. CrookhamOregon Supreme Court · 1980

39 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API