Legal Opinion

Christman v. SAIF Corp.

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided May 1, 2002No. 99-04174, 99-01430; A109424PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtWollheim, J.

Claimant seeks judicial review of a Workers’ Compensation Board order that failed to assign responsibility for claimant’s right carpal tunnel syndrome to either Wells Fargo & Company (Wells Fargo) or Charles H. Day Company, Inc. (Day), because the Board decided that an earlier employer, Protection One, which was not joined in the proceeding, was responsible. We conclude that the Board’s decision is not supported by substantial reason and remand for reconsideration.

The material facts are not disputed. For the past 12 years, claimant has worked for three different employers, doing similar…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Armstrong v. Asten-Hill Co.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 1988
  2. Boise Cascade Corp. v. StarbuckOregon Supreme Court · 1984
  3. SAIF Corp. v. JanuaryCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2000
  4. Destael v. Nicolai Co.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 1986
  5. Reynolds Metals v. RogersCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1998

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Cummings v. SAIF Corp.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 2005
  2. Federal Express Corp. v. EstradaCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2015
  3. SAIF Corp. v. Maldonado (In re Maldonado)Court of Appeals of Oregon · 2018
  4. Braden v. SAIF Corp.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 2003
  5. Pietrzykowski v. Albertsons, Inc.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 2005

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API