Legal Opinion

Braden v. SAIF Corp.

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided May 8, 2003No. 00-07986; A115779PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the CourtWollheim, J.

Claimant seeks review of an order of the Workers’ Compensation Board that set aside in part and affirmed in part SAIF’s compensability denial. Claimant contends that the board erred when it concluded that procedural requirements did not prevent it from fashioning a remedy eliminating SAIF’s duty to process a combined condition claim in a manner consistent with the law. Further, claimant argues that, in any case, the board did not have the authority to reach the issue because neither party had raised it. We review for errors of law, ORS 183.482(7) and (8), and reverse and remand.

The facts are…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Portland General Electric Co. v. Bureau of Labor & IndustriesOregon Supreme Court · 1993
  2. Destael v. Nicolai Co.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 1986
  3. Croman Corp. v. SerranoCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1999
  4. Christman v. SAIF Corp.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 2002
  5. Blamires v. Clean Pak Systems, Inc.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 2000

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Travelers Ins. Co. v. Arevalo (In re Comp. of Arevalo)Court of Appeals of Oregon · 2019

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API