Legal Opinion

Sparks v. Board of Library Trustees

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided May 14, 1946No. 32306PublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

HURST, V.C.J.

This appeal involves the constitutionality of House Bill No. 110 of the Twentieth Legislature, S.L. 1945, page 84, which creates a law library for Carter county, creates a board of law library trustees to manage the library consisting of the district judge, county judge, and county attorney of Carter county and two members of the county bar association and defines their duties, creates a county law library fund to be taken from the court fund and provides that the fund shall be expended by the board of trustees, provides for the free use of said library by the judges of the…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Chickasha Cotton Oil Co. v. Lamb & TynerSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1911
  2. Sheldon v. Grand River Dam AuthoritySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1938
  3. Farley v. Board of Education of City of PerrySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1917
  4. Leatherock v. LawterSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1915
  5. Chicago, R. I. & P. Ry. Co. v. Carroll, Brough, Robinson & HumphreySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1925

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. State Ex Rel. Nesbitt v. District Court of Mayes CountySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1968
  2. State Ex Rel. Williamson v. EvansSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1957
  3. State Ex Rel. MacY v. BD. OF COM'RSSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1999
  4. Opinion No. (2011), Oklahoma Attorney General Reports2011
  5. Opinion No. 68-364 (1968) Ag, Oklahoma Attorney General Reports1968

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API