Legal Opinion

Opinion No. (2011)

Oklahoma Attorney General Reports

Decided July 1, 2011Published

1Opinion of the Court

Dear Senator Brecheen:

This office has received your request for an official Attorney General Opinion in which you ask, in effect, the following questions:

1. Does Section 46 of Article V of the Oklahoma Constitution, which prohibits enactment of local or special laws on certain subjects, prevent the State of Oklahoma from setting by law the per diem rate to be paid to counties to defray the cost of the incarceration of state or federal1 prisoners retained in a county jail?

2. Does Section 23b of Article X of the Oklahoma Constitution, which authorizes the State to contract with counties for the…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Reynolds v. PorterSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1988
  2. Darnell v. Chrysler Corp.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1984
  3. State ex rel. Macy v. Board of County CommissionersSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1999
  4. City of Enid v. Public Employees Relations BoardSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 2006
  5. Grant v. Goodyear Tire & Rubber Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 2000

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API