Legal Opinion

Quevedo v. Superior Court

California Court of Appeal

Decided May 10, 1933No. Docket No. 1250PublishedCited by 23 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBarnard, P. J.

Upon the application of petitioner, a writ of review was issued by the Supreme Court and made returnable before this court. It appears that the petitioner brought an action in the respondent court seeking to recover some $30,000 as damages for personal injuries alleged to have been caused by the negligence of the defendants in the action. The answer of the defendants denied negligence on their part and alleged contributory negligence on the part of the plaintiff. A jury returned a verdict in favor of the petitioner in the sum of $4,000 and judgment was entered accordingly. In due course the…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Pearl v. PearlCalifornia Supreme Court · 1918
  2. Stanton v. Superior Court of CaliforniaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1927
  3. Donnatin v. Union Hardware & Metal Co.California Court of Appeal · 1918
  4. Ransome-Crummey Co. v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1922
  5. Diamond v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1922

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by23 opinions

  1. Phelan v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1950
  2. Hamasaki v. FlothoCalifornia Supreme Court · 1952
  3. Whitley v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1941
  4. Cox v. Tyrone Power Enterprises Inc.California Court of Appeal · 1942
  5. Rines v. Justices of the Superior CourtMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1953

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API