Legal Opinion

Pearl v. Pearl

California Supreme Court

Decided January 25, 1918No. S. F. No. 7912PublishedCited by 71 opinions

The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.

1Opinion of the CourtWilbur, J.

This is an appeal from a judgment for plaintiff rendered after a verdict by a jury on special issues and the decision by the court adopting said verdict. The action is brought by the plaintiff to compel an • accounting from the defendant of the proceeds of the sale of certain real estate therein described. The complaint alleges that the defendant is the son of John Q. Pearl, deceased; that the said decedent, on April 28, 1902, executed a deed to the defendant to all his real estate, without consideration, upon defendant’s promise to take and hold the same in trust during the lifetime of…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Janes v. ThrockmortonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1881
  2. Norton v. BassettCalifornia Supreme Court · 1908
  3. Barlow v. StrangeSupreme Court of Georgia · 1904
  4. Collins v. O'LavertyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1902
  5. Clarke v. IrwinNebraska Supreme Court · 1902

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by71 opinions

  1. Rose v. Melody LaneCalifornia Supreme Court · 1952
  2. Hamasaki v. FlothoCalifornia Supreme Court · 1952
  3. Leipert v. HonoldCalifornia Supreme Court · 1952
  4. Goewey v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1979
  5. Cox v. Tyrone Power Enterprises Inc.California Court of Appeal · 1942

66 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API