Legal Opinion

Ransome-Crummey Co. v. Superior Court

California Supreme Court

Decided March 11, 1922No. S. F. No. 9992PublishedCited by 51 opinions

APPLICATION for a Writ of Mandate directed to the Superior Court of Santa Clara County. J. R. Welch, Judge. The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.

1Opinion of the CourtLawlor, J.

This is a petition for a writ of mandate to be issued directing respondents, the superior court of the state of California, in and for the county of Santa Clara, and the Honorable J. R. Welch, a judge thereof, to take jurisdiction of a motion for a new trial interposed by petitioner in the case of Ransome-Crummey Company v. John H. Graves et al., numbered 20902 in the records of the said court, and directing respondents to grant the motion as of the sixth day of September, 1921.

Petitioner commenced the said suit on June 14, 1913, to foreclose a lien on certain property in the city of San…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Title Insurance & Trust Co. v. California Development Co.California Supreme Court · 1915
  2. Lancel v. PostlethwaiteCalifornia Supreme Court · 1916
  3. Rossi v. CaireCalifornia Supreme Court · 1921
  4. Granger v. RichardsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1908
  5. San Francisco-Oakland Terminal Railway v. Superior Court of Alameda CountyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1916

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by51 opinions

  1. Hamasaki v. FlothoCalifornia Supreme Court · 1952
  2. Peacock Hill Ass'n v. Peacock Lagoon Construction Co.California Supreme Court · 1972
  3. Boyle v. Lakeview Creamery Co.California Supreme Court · 1937
  4. Traub Co. v. Coffee Break Service, Inc.California Supreme Court · 1967
  5. Prothero v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1925

46 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API