Legal Opinion

Whitley v. Superior Court

California Supreme Court

Decided May 28, 1941No. L. A. 17793PublishedCited by 80 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtCurtis, J.

This is an application by the petitioner, Mable Whitley, for a writ of certiorari seeking to annul, vacate and set aside two nunc pro tunc orders made and entered in the Superior Court of the County of Los Angeles, granting a motion for new trial on the ground of the insufficiency of the evidence to sustain the verdict of the jury.

Petitioner, as plaintiff, instituted action against Belyea Truck Company, a California corporation, and Fred Clement to recover for personal injuries. After a trial by jury, verdict was rendered in her favor in the sum of $3,000 and judgment was entered accordingly…

2Cases cited26 opinions

  1. Rodman v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1939
  2. People v. WeitzelCalifornia Supreme Court · 1927
  3. Stanton v. Superior Court of CaliforniaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1927
  4. In Re Estate of MoffittCalifornia Supreme Court · 1908
  5. Diamond v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1922

21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by80 opinions

  1. People v. DavenportCalifornia Supreme Court · 1985
  2. Estate of McDillCalifornia Supreme Court · 1975
  3. Mercer v. PerezCalifornia Supreme Court · 1968
  4. Palos Verdes Faculty Ass'n v. Palos Verdes Peninsula Unified School DistrictCalifornia Supreme Court · 1978
  5. Phelan v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1950

75 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API