Legal Opinion

Highview North Apartments v. County of Ramsey

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided August 20, 1982No. 81-676, 81-971 and 81-921PublishedCited by 25 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

SIMONETT, Justice.

Defendant municipalities appeal from a judgment holding them liable on a nuisance theory for damages to plaintiff’s property attributed to defendants’ water drainage systems. Defendants contend that no causal connection between their actions and plaintiff’s damage was proven, that in any event nuisance does not lie, and that, at the very least, the damage award is improper and excessive. We affirm.

In early 1980 the plaintiff, Highview North Apartments, a partnership, sued defendants County of Ramsey, City of Maple-wood, and City of North St. Paul. Fourteen years before, in…

2Cases cited21 opinions

  1. Sheehan v. FlynnSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1894
  2. Randall v. Village of ExcelsiorSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1960
  3. Enderson v. KelehanSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1948
  4. O'Brien v. City of St. PaulSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1878
  5. Crookston Cattle Co. v. Minnesota Department of Natural ResourcesSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1980

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by25 opinions

  1. Heins Implement Co. v. Missouri Highway & Transportation CommissionSupreme Court of Missouri · 1993
  2. Werlein v. United StatesDistrict Court, D. Minnesota · 1990
  3. American Computer Trust Leasing v. Jack Farrell Implement Co.District Court, D. Minnesota · 1991
  4. Sletten v. Ramsey CountySupreme Court of Minnesota · 2004
  5. Wilson v. RamacherSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1984

20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API