Legal Opinion
Wilson v. Ramacher
Supreme Court of Minnesota
Decided July 27, 1984No. C4-82-1592PublishedCited by 31 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
SIMONETT, Justice.
We affirm the trial court’s summary dismissal of claims by a landowner against a municipality for negligent and unreasonable diversion of surface waters onto the landowner’s property. We reverse and remand, however, to allow the landowner to proceed with a claim for inverse condemnation.
Plaintiff-appellant Robert Wilson owns a 10-acre tract in the City of Lino Lakes. Immediately north of his tract is Ulmer’s Rice Lake Addition, a newly platted residential area now containing some 34 homes. Immediately south of plaintiff Wilson’s tract is Golden’s Rice Lake Terrace Addition,…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Cairl v. StateSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1982
- Enderson v. KelehanSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1948
- Spaeth v. City of PlymouthSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1984
- Erickson v. General United Life Insurance Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1977
- Highview North Apartments v. County of RamseySupreme Court of Minnesota · 1982
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by31 opinions
- Nusbaum v. County of Blue EarthSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1988
- Holmquist v. StateSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1988
- Heins Implement Co. v. Missouri Highway & Transportation CommissionSupreme Court of Missouri · 1993
- Andrade v. EllefsonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1986
- Mark Koscielski Barbara Bergstrom, Individually and D/B/A Koscielski's Guns and Ammo v. City of MinneapolisCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2006
26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.