Randall v. Village of Excelsior
Supreme Court of Minnesota
1Opinion of the Court
Murphy, Justice.
This is an appeal from an order dismissing plaintiff’s complaint on the ground that it failed to state a claim upon which relief could be granted. Defendant entered no answer, and the motion for dismissal was heard on the pleadings only. We are therefore called upon to determine whether the facts alleged in the complaint entitle plaintiff to relief under any theory.
The complaint alleges that plaintiff, a minor now 18 years of age, along with other minors, sent one of their number to purchase intoxicating liquors from defendant’s municipal liquor store. It is asserted that…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- Beck v. GroeSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1955
- Hahn v. City of OrtonvilleSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1953
- Schelin v. GoldbergSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1958
- Brooks v. CookMichigan Supreme Court · 1880
- DeLahunta v. City of WaterburySupreme Court of Connecticut · 1948
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by52 opinions
- Philip Morris, Inc. v. EmersonSupreme Court of Virginia · 1988
- Lefto v. Hoggsbreath Enterprises, Inc.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1998
- Hostetler v. WardCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1985
- Village of Brooten, a Municipal Corporation v. Cudahy Packing Company, a Corporation, and the Travelers Indemnity Company, a CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1961
- American Computer Trust Leasing v. Jack Farrell Implement Co.District Court, D. Minnesota · 1991
47 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.