Heins Implement Co. v. Missouri Highway & Transportation Commission
Supreme Court of Missouri
1Opinion of the Court
PRICE, Judge.
The principal issue raised by this appeal is whether the modified common enemy doctrine should be applied to bar recovery by landowners and tenants whose property was flooded because a culvert under a highway bypass was not designed to handle the normal overflows from a nearby creek. We conclude that the common enemy doctrine no longer reflects the appropriate rule in situations involving surface water runoff and adopt a doctrine of reasonable use in its stead. We reverse the trial court’s grant of judgment notwithstanding the verdict and remand.
I. Background
A defendant’s motion…
2Cases cited107 opinions
- ITT Commercial Finance Corp. v. Mid-America Marine Supply Corp.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1993
- Commercial Carrier Corp. v. Indian River Cty.Supreme Court of Florida · 1979
- Coffey v. City of MilwaukeeWisconsin Supreme Court · 1976
- Rodrigues v. StateHawaii Supreme Court · 1970
- Brennen v. City of EugeneOregon Supreme Court · 1979
102 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by82 opinions
- Southers v. City of FarmingtonSupreme Court of Missouri · 2008
- McCracken v. Wal-Mart Stores East, LPSupreme Court of Missouri · 2009
- Seitz v. Lemay Bank and Trust Co.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1998
- Locklin v. City of LafayetteCalifornia Supreme Court · 1994
- The Metropolitan St. Louis Sewer District v. The City of Bellefontaine Neighbors, Sherrell Construction, Inc.Supreme Court of Missouri · 2016
77 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.