Legal Opinion
Werlein v. United States
District Court, D. Minnesota
Decided September 4, 1990No. Civ. 3-84-996PublishedCited by 77 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER
RENNER, District Judge.
Before the Court are a host of summary judgment and dismissal motions by defendants the United States of America, et al. (“United States”), Federal-Hoffman, Inc. (“FHI”), Honeywell, Inc., (“Honeywell”), Norton Erickson (“Erickson”) and Sylvester Bendel (“Bendel”), as well as plaintiffs’ renewed motion for class certification.
This matter came on for oral hearing on March 21, 1990.
This case is a complex and long-lived action arising out of chemical discharges, primarily of trichloroethylene (“TCE”), by various tenants at the Twin Cities Army Ammunition Plant…
2Cases cited46 opinions
- Gwaltney of Smithfield, Ltd. v. Chesapeake Bay Foundation, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1987
- Blackie v. BarrackCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1975
- Finley v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
- Hubbard v. United Press International, Inc.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1983
- Ayers v. Township of JacksonSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1987
41 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by77 opinions
- Potter v. Firestone Tire & Rubber Co.California Supreme Court · 1993
- William Barnes v. The American Tobacco CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1998
- Daigle v. Shell Oil Co.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1992
- Sierra Club v. El Paso Gold Mines, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2005
- Liberty Lincoln Mercury, Inc. v. Ford Marketing Corp.District Court, D. New Jersey · 1993
72 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.