Legal Opinion

Romo v. Estate of Bennett

California Court of Appeal

Decided September 26, 1979No. Civ. 4084PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

HOPPER, J.

In this action for damages limited to the extent of liability insurance for medical malpractice alleged to have taken place in 1965 but not discovered by due diligence until 1975, appellant appeals from a summary judgment entered in favor of the respondent grounded upon an alleged bar of Probate Code section 721 enacted in 1971. We reverse.

Appellant, Benjamin Nathan Romo (hereinafter Benjamin) was born in Merced, California, on February 5, 1965. Dr. Charles R. Bennett was the attending physician. Dr. Bennett died on February 12, 1966. His estate was thereupon probated. The…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Brown v. MerloCalifornia Supreme Court · 1973
  2. Whitfield v. RothCalifornia Supreme Court · 1974
  3. Nathanson v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1974
  4. Hurlimann v. Bank of America National Trust & Savings Ass'nCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1956
  5. Wozniak v. Peninsula HospitalCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1969

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Brown v. BleibergCalifornia Supreme Court · 1982
  2. Institoris v. City of Los AngelesCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1989
  3. Quarry v. Doe 1California Court of Appeal · 2009
  4. Quarry v. Doe ICalifornia Supreme Court · 2012
  5. Quarry v. Doe ICalifornia Supreme Court · 2012

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API