Legal Opinion

Institoris v. City of Los Angeles

California Court of Appeal

Decided May 3, 1989No. B032532PublishedCited by 27 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

HANSON, J.

Introduction

This case, involving aircraft overflight of property near Los Angeles International Airport, raises issues involving how the statute of limitations and the acquisition of an avigation easement affect causes of action for inverse condemnation and nuisance.

Facts

On May 2, 1988, pursuant to California Rules of Court, rule 6(a), Emil Institoris (plaintiff in the trial court, and appellant on appeal) and the City of Los Angeles (defendant in the trial court, and respondent and appellant on cross-appeal) filed an agreed statement on appeal. The parties agreed that the…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. Nestle v. City of Santa MonicaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1972
  2. Greater Westchester Homeowners Ass'n v. City of Los AngelesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1979
  3. Baker v. Burbank-Glendale-Pasadena Airport AuthorityCalifornia Supreme Court · 1985
  4. Venuto v. Owens-Corning Fiberglas Corp.California Court of Appeal · 1971
  5. Pierpont Inn, Inc. v. State of CaliforniaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1969

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by27 opinions

  1. Ileto v. Glock Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2003
  2. Jordan v. City of Santa BarbaraCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1996
  3. Capogeannis v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1993
  4. Koll-Irvine Center Property Owners Ass'n v. County of OrangeCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1994
  5. Orange Cnty. Water Dist. v. Sabic Innovative Plastics United States, LLC, California Court of Appeal, 5th District2017

22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API